On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 05:37:07AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/20/2012 04:36 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:14:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On 01/19/2012 12:41 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> From my POV the move in question doesn't necessarily achieve anything > >>> in the vision or further Fedora's goals. > >> > >> We disagree on that. Point 1 and 2 in the vision requires open tools. > >> > > Since duckduckgo isn't open, are you saying that 1 and 2 are not applicable? > > Is that a rhetorical question? duckduckgo is more open than google is. > for instance, a more open privacy policy > No, it was a request for clarification. Talking about "open tools" leads me to think you mean open source or open standards... I didn't understand what you were saying. So what you're saying is that duckduckgo is more transparent than google and that aligns with our vision statement better? So to examine that: """ * free culture is welcoming and widespread, * collaboration is commonplace, """ How does the default search engine in firefox having a published privacy policy: make free culture welcoming and widespread? How does the default search engine in firefo having a published privacy policy make collaboration commonplace? > >> > > To put in a counter -- I don't think the Board has any business trying to > > manage at all. Lead, yes. Manage, no. > > Don't see the board doing either much Which is likely better than them doing both :-) -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp4a1JodxbK9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
