On 01/20/2012 04:36 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:14:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 01/19/2012 12:41 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> >>> >>> From my POV the move in question doesn't necessarily achieve anything >>> in the vision or further Fedora's goals. >> >> We disagree on that. Point 1 and 2 in the vision requires open tools. >> > Since duckduckgo isn't open, are you saying that 1 and 2 are not applicable? Is that a rhetorical question? duckduckgo is more open than google is. for instance, a more open privacy policy > Reading the duckduckgo faq, it seems like their main thrust is that they > keep less information about search patterns than google. That's not all of it certainly. I recommend using it for a while. One example. http://duckduckgo.com/bang.html >> > To put in a counter -- I don't think the Board has any business trying to > manage at all. Lead, yes. Manage, no. Don't see the board doing either much Rahul Rahul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
