Re: Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2011 02:56 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> But with this agreement Red Hat is now capable of doing so but could not 
> do so before?
> 
>> >   but to be able to have a record from contributors as to
>> > their agreement to the ICLA/FPCA terms and for there to be a conscious
>> > understanding on the part of the contributor that the terms of the
>> > ICLA/FPCA apply to them.
> Is it possible to get some clarification and more information about the 
> ICLA/FPCA in human language ( dont speak legaieaze )
> 
> What prompted for this change?
> 
> What happens to those that already have agreed to the CLA?
> 
> What happens to community members that are not willing to agree to 
> ICLA/FPCA or refuses to take up a new legal agreement?

Jóhann, I suspect the answers to your questions are well covered here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Fedora_Project_Contributor_Agreement

Please let me know if they are not.

~tom

==
Fedora Project
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux