Re: Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:12:11 -0500
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Are you suggesting the FYI be added to the CLA change announcement, or
> part of the CLA signing (which I believe is done in the accounts
> system
> - though I might be wrong since I signed mine back in the days when we
> had to fax them)? 

The signing. (Although I suppose it could also be mentioned in any
announcement, this wouldn't get people down the road who come along by
itself). 

> I'm fine with not having people having to 'sign' an agreement for the
> COC (though maybe an acknowledgment that they read it would be nice),
> but I think just adding an FYI to the CLA announcement isn't enough
> since that would only ensure current contributors would see it, and
> not future ones. 

Agreed. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux