Re: Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:19:49 -0600
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 13:17:00 -0500,
>   Ricky Zhou <ricky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2011-03-02 12:12:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > It seems to be overly heavy handed way to make people aware of
> > > the policy. I'd rather see it treated like other policies people
> > > are expected to follow.
> > Is there any particular reason we don't want to be heavy handed with
> > making people aware of it?
> 
> I think being heavy handed results in a negative perception even if
> the policy is good. It also seems to set an expectation that people
> are bad by default. 

I have no problem personally with notifying people of the code of
conduct, but I don't think we should require them to explicitly click a
'I am signing this thing in agreement'. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux