On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:19:49 -0600 > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 13:17:00 -0500, >> Ricky Zhou <ricky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 2011-03-02 12:12:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> > > It seems to be overly heavy handed way to make people aware of >> > > the policy. I'd rather see it treated like other policies people >> > > are expected to follow. >> > Is there any particular reason we don't want to be heavy handed with >> > making people aware of it? >> >> I think being heavy handed results in a negative perception even if >> the policy is good. It also seems to set an expectation that people >> are bad by default. > > I have no problem personally with notifying people of the code of > conduct, but I don't think we should require them to explicitly click a > 'I am signing this thing in agreement'. I wonder if 'I am signing this thing in agreement' would even be possible if a contributor is using a corporate CLA instead of an individual one. I don't immediately see how it would. josh _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
