On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:31:32 -0700,I really need to finish up my Spins SIG job descriptions. The leader and the
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Short term the spins sig is currently dead. We could:
> a) Try and revitalize it. This is going to take someone stepping up as
> spins wrangler, owners of spins stepping up to attend meetings and help
wranger can (and should) be different people. We first need an energenic
leader with some opinions on what spins should be. The wrangler job is
easier (especially if there are people to delegate some tasks to).
This could work if we limited ourselves to a few spins with strong SIGs
> b) Move spins to be controlled by sigs. The problem with this is that
> then there is no one watching dates, controlling when things are
> committed to SCM, approved, etc.
behind them. But someone would need to decide which spins had strong enough
backing to do this for.
If we are *very* clear about what it takes to be an "official" SIG, and there's no illusions about what those requirements are, and if the spins SIG is working constantly to lower these requirements with efficient tools and processes, then we don't need to decide -- we can allow the SIGs to decide for themselves.
--g
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
