On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 04:59:32PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> > I would be concerned that a FAD that brings together the majority of >> > Board, FESCo, and FAMSCo members may be more cost proihibitive than most FADs. >> > But I suspect that it could be justified. >> > >> > How much representation of the groups do we have signed up @ FUDCon? >> >> And, answering my own question... >> >> FPL will be present, of course. >> >> 7 of 9 Board members are scheduled to be there (missing Jaroslav Reznik, and >> the to-be-appointed seat.) >> >> 5 of 9 FESCo members are scheduled to be there (missing Adam Jackson, >> Matthew Garrett, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovÃ, and Matthias Clasen) >> >> 4 of 7 FAMSCo members are scheduled to be there (missing Rahul Sundaram, >> Pierros Papadeas, and Caius Chance) >> > Note that in doing this we'd be sacrificing the hackfest time for these > people. ÂI can do that but it's good to have on the tale up front. I agree, not to mention that those people wouldn't get the time to interact with the rest of the folks at the FUDCon. I'd definitely see FUDCon as a great way for the Board, FESCo, and FAmSCo to get feedback about $myriadissues from various groups and members of the community, and work with those people on solving problems - meeting together in person, IMO, would be best done at another time (perhaps following interacting with all community folks, finding out what community people think are important issues, etc.) -robyn > > -Toshio > > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board > _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
