Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > 2) A formal charter of some sort is needed because what we have as a > > wiki and some documents does not scale for larger than 60-120 people. > > After that size some human brain automatically makes some other person > > a non-entity at some point in the conversation and people have no idea > > where they stand. It doesn't matter if the people know and work next > > to each other.. once their brains start taking in the fact that their > > overall group is larger than X (where X is some built in variable per > > human brain) they require more formalized rules. > > > > Basically, people who want less rules and bureaucracy can only get > > away with it in smaller groups. At some size we don't scale complexity > > linearly any more and it all goes to hell. [Humans suck for community > > building.. but they won't fund my T7000 project to replace them.] > > > I could definitely go for this. it is though, rather than a bi-yearly > meeting, an in depth FAD on Governance. So I still don't know that we > should arbitrarily say that we should meet every six months but this sounds > like a good topic to hold a FAD on. I would be concerned that a FAD that brings together the majority of Board, FESCo, and FAMSCo members may be more cost proihibitive than most FADs. But I suspect that it could be justified. How much representation of the groups do we have signed up @ FUDCon? Bill _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
