On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/1/10 10:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 10/1/10 9:07 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > >>> That shift would work just like the ASF works now perhaps with more focus > >>> on interoperability. We'd need project managers that manage each product, > >>> coordinate with other project managers. We'd turn Fedora into a community > >>> software factory. That stuff still needs to be packaged, but not as many > >>> people will be installing them. > >>> > >>>>> I'm curious, what are the actual tangible goals we can work on? > >>>>> > >>> Build framework, build apps for that framework. Email, communication. > >>> Build an online writer app, spreadsheet, etc. Get buy-in from other > >>> major communities (that's important). > >> > >> Since these things largely require resources we don't already have, why > >> can't we continue to use the resources we have to continue to produce > >> the OS (which will still be needed) while trying to get the other > >> resources needed to do the other things here you mention? > >> > >> Or to put it differently, what are we doing now that is getting in the > >> way of doing what you propose? > >> > > > > Nothing, I think we can and should do both, for at least several years > > when we can re-evaluate. Ultimately though I think we'll see a thinning > > of the desktop software we ship. > > > > Ok, then I welcome your new efforts and wish you luck! Let me know if > there is anything I can do to help you with it :) > I'm not leading it, I'm proposing it. This is all for the board for review and decision. -Mike _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
