-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/1/10 9:07 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > That shift would work just like the ASF works now perhaps with more focus > on interoperability. We'd need project managers that manage each product, > coordinate with other project managers. We'd turn Fedora into a community > software factory. That stuff still needs to be packaged, but not as many > people will be installing them. > >> > I'm curious, what are the actual tangible goals we can work on? >> > > Build framework, build apps for that framework. Email, communication. > Build an online writer app, spreadsheet, etc. Get buy-in from other > major communities (that's important). Since these things largely require resources we don't already have, why can't we continue to use the resources we have to continue to produce the OS (which will still be needed) while trying to get the other resources needed to do the other things here you mention? Or to put it differently, what are we doing now that is getting in the way of doing what you propose? - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkymFSsACgkQ4v2HLvE71NUECACdGum1MWV8gOzJiMKpxp2g/3Lw L4YAn2p7TUgIzRXA0xc56mGV7YUtwHDn =Qo+d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
