On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/1/10 9:07 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > That shift would work just like the ASF works now perhaps with more focus > > on interoperability. We'd need project managers that manage each product, > > coordinate with other project managers. We'd turn Fedora into a community > > software factory. That stuff still needs to be packaged, but not as many > > people will be installing them. > > > >> > I'm curious, what are the actual tangible goals we can work on? > >> > > > Build framework, build apps for that framework. Email, communication. > > Build an online writer app, spreadsheet, etc. Get buy-in from other > > major communities (that's important). > > Since these things largely require resources we don't already have, why > can't we continue to use the resources we have to continue to produce > the OS (which will still be needed) while trying to get the other > resources needed to do the other things here you mention? > > Or to put it differently, what are we doing now that is getting in the > way of doing what you propose? > Nothing, I think we can and should do both, for at least several years when we can re-evaluate. Ultimately though I think we'll see a thinning of the desktop software we ship. -Mike _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
