On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:34 AM, seth vidal wrote:
----
Yes, that cannot be changed without a switch to being a non-profit foundation but if the same organization controls all the servers, shutting them all down is much more easier.
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 02:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:whois fedoraproject.org
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>
>
> FWIW, one vendor doesn't "own" all the infrastructure. We're
> a pretty
> diverse group as far as infrastructure goes with several
> sponsors. It's
> something we've been working on for some time.
>
> Yes and that is a very good thing. Thanks for that.
one org controls the domain. If things are ugly the domain's nameservers
are updated and control is changed.
That's the ballgame.
----
Yes, that cannot be changed without a switch to being a non-profit foundation but if the same organization controls all the servers, shutting them all down is much more easier.
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
