On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 01:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/17/2010 12:28 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Let me reverse that question. What does Red Hat get out of employing > >> the Fedora Project leader and having the person have veto rights over > >> the board? What would Red Hat lose by giving up on the veto power? The > >> benefit to losing the power is that others vendors and the volunteer > >> community would feel more in control. > > There are other vendors? I want to hear from representatives of those > > other vendors.. publicly..on the record..as to their current feelings > > with regard to lack of control. > > Let us assume for a moment that there are no other vendors in the entire > Fedora community except for Red Hat. Would you want to facilitate that > by providing a opportunity to participate in a equivalent footing? > equivalent footing? One org owns all the infrastructure and big amount of the devels on @core. It's not equivalent. -sv _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
