On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Yes and that is a very good thing. Thanks for that.
---
If you agree with the goal, then the burden is not on some large vendor to be beating down on our door but for us within Fedora to reach out as much as possible to other vendors and get them to participate. I see that already happening and would like to continue to see it moving forward to a point where as much as our infrastructure is hosted outside of Red Hat systems as possible.
Rahul
FWIW, one vendor doesn't "own" all the infrastructure. We're a pretty
diverse group as far as infrastructure goes with several sponsors. It's
something we've been working on for some time.
Yes and that is a very good thing. Thanks for that.
Let me rephrase your question though. You're not just asking more people
to step in but also remember you're asking for someone else to take on
risk as well. Right now Red Hat is completely liable for Fedora and what
happens in it.
It's not like $LARGE_VENDOR is beating down our door looking to give large
sums of money in infrastructure, legal advice, personnel, etc. What
you're discussing isn't even worth talking about until someone else steps
up and offers that. I don't see that happening any time soon.
---
If you agree with the goal, then the burden is not on some large vendor to be beating down on our door but for us within Fedora to reach out as much as possible to other vendors and get them to participate. I see that already happening and would like to continue to see it moving forward to a point where as much as our infrastructure is hosted outside of Red Hat systems as possible.
Rahul
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
