On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 12:41 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:00:32PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> On 07/07/2010 10:56 AM, seth vidal wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > To be clear - we tried to have some intervention in the form of the hall > >> > monitors. all we got in return was everyone second-guessing the hall > >> > monitors and cries of censorship. > >> > > >> > Why do you think any other system is going to fair better? > >> > >> IMO, the previous policy was poor and enforcement was unclear. > >> > > > >And you believe the current proposal is going to be more clear and the > >board will be more likely to enforce things? B/c I don't. > > > >I think what's going to happen is that any attempts at enforcement will > >be language-lawyered by the trolls and then appealed to the board and > >the board, will, of course, waffle on it and be unwilling to support the > >enforcement for fear of losing contributors. > > They'll lose them either way. It's a matter of balancing which way is going > to lose fewer. > Agreed. -sv _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
