Re: fedora community working group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:00:32PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> On 07/07/2010 10:56 AM, seth vidal wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> > To be clear - we tried to have some intervention in the form of the hall
>> > monitors. all we got in return was everyone second-guessing the hall
>> > monitors and cries of censorship.
>> >
>> > Why do you think any other system is going to fair better?
>> 
>> IMO, the previous policy was poor and enforcement was unclear.
>> 
>
>And you believe the current proposal is going to be more clear and the
>board will be more likely to enforce things? B/c I don't.
>
>I think what's going to happen is that any attempts at enforcement will
>be language-lawyered by the trolls and then appealed to the board and
>the board, will, of course, waffle on it and be unwilling to support the
>enforcement for fear of losing contributors.

They'll lose them either way.  It's a matter of balancing which way is going
to lose fewer.

josh
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux