On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Thomas Janssen wrote: > You really dont care of the few users who use it and will let them go > to another distribution who provides the software? > And even dont care about the lost contributor? > I thought we are on the "we need/want more contributors" way. > > I'm having a hard time to understand the motivation why you wrote that. I'll quote the sections: 20:43:30 <mjg59> The risk is when we have packages where 3 votes is a substantial proportion of the users 20:43:45 <skvidal> mjg59: which, imo, makes me wonder why we're shipping those pkgs at all. 20:43:58 <mjg59> skvidal: It's not unreasonable 20:44:06 <skvidal> mjg59: to wonder that? or to ship them? 20:44:11 <mjg59> skvidal: Either and then 20:58:44 <notting> cwickert: ... i could be convinced that for the far out fringe packages that passing autoqa may be enough 20:59:12 <skvidal> notting: I'd believe that far out fringe pkgs might fall into the category of things to be removed :) I don't think I could have made more qualified statements In the first one I said "it makes me wonder why" and in the second one I said "might fall into". We're really getting nitpicky here about things I wonder about. -sv _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
