http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-09/fesco.2010-03-09-20.00.log.html > 20:59:11 <dgilmore> Kevin_Kofler: i dont see Michael Schwendt as infulencial. > he choose to largely abstain from fedora years ago This is one thing that troubles me since yesterday. My reply to devel list is unanswered. In particular, I want to learn what this refers to. I'd also like to know whether the following is an example of "lead by example", "be excellent to eachother" and "respect"? 20:43:30 <mjg59> The risk is when we have packages where 3 votes is a substantial proportion of the users 20:43:45 <skvidal> mjg59: which, imo, makes me wonder why we're shipping those pkgs at all. 20:45:30 <cwickert> I know there are people that will leave Fedora if we decide a policy that forbids major updates. both users and contributors 20:45:42 <skvidal> cwickert: people threatening to leave should leave 20:45:48 <skvidal> orphan your packages and go 20:45:57 <skvidal> I'll be glad to clean up that mess 20:59:12 <skvidal> notting: I'd believe that far out fringe pkgs might fall into the category of things to be removed :) _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
