On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-09/fesco.2010-03-09-20.00.log.html > >> 20:59:11 <dgilmore> Kevin_Kofler: i dont see Michael Schwendt as infulencial. >> he choose to largely abstain from fedora years ago > > This is one thing that troubles me since yesterday. My reply to devel list > is unanswered. In particular, I want to learn what this refers to. > > > I'd also like to know whether the following is an example of "lead by > example", "be excellent to eachother" and "respect"? But threatening to leave if you don't get your way? That's excellent? Making ultimatums, that's respect? > 20:43:30 <mjg59> The risk is when we have packages where 3 votes is a substantial proportion of the users > 20:43:45 <skvidal> mjg59: which, imo, makes me wonder why we're shipping those pkgs at all. How is this anything other than a statement of the case? > 20:45:30 <cwickert> I know there are people that will leave Fedora if we > decide a policy that forbids major updates. both users and contributors > 20:45:42 <skvidal> cwickert: people threatening to leave should leave > 20:45:48 <skvidal> orphan your packages and go > 20:45:57 <skvidal> I'll be glad to clean up that mess Again statement of the obvious. I do not like it when folks try to play the "I'll take my ball and go home" card. If you are threatening to leave, then please leave. > 20:59:12 <skvidal> notting: I'd believe that far out fringe pkgs might > fall into the category of things to be removed :) If we have packages in the distro for which we cannot find enough people to test outside of the package maintainer then my question is - who is using it? If so few people are using it then aren't we just wasting bandwidth and diskspace having it around? -sv _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
