Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >I think more to the crux, we're leading-edge in rawhide, but then that > >leading-edge flows right into our "stable" releases, as in the stable > >releases continue to be 'leading-edge' and change things on users. > > > >If we adopted more of a stance of leading edge on rawhide, stability in > >our releases, I think we'd have less grumpy users. > > they'd still have to upgrade every 13 months no matter what. It's > not like we've bought them all that much time. Yes, but if you constrain the leading-edge change to an OS upgrade event, rather than doled out randomly with each update of your released OS, it can be planned for, and expectations set. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
