On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:40 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > And this is the crux of our problem: > > fedora is for latest leading-edge pkgs. It's not easy or reasonable to > have the latest of things AND have a stable interface for them. > > So if latest software is fedora's raison d'etre then it sure seems like > fedora is just not for you. > > how else do we set reasonable expectations? I think more to the crux, we're leading-edge in rawhide, but then that leading-edge flows right into our "stable" releases, as in the stable releases continue to be 'leading-edge' and change things on users. If we adopted more of a stance of leading edge on rawhide, stability in our releases, I think we'd have less grumpy users. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
