On Tue, 19 May 2009, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Tom "spot" Callaway:
On 05/19/2009 10:08 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Sorry, but I disagree. Remember, we already had ambassadors leaving the
project after the CLA changed. I don't share their concerns (otherwise I
had to resign, too), but I do see there are people not willing to sign
the current CLA which means they cannot get a FAS account.
This is a separate issue, lets not dogpile everything together
unnecessarily. There are some legitimate issues with the current CLA
that I am constantly working on resolving, but this is perhaps the most
complicated legal matter currently on Fedora Legal's plate. Even with
that, your statement that a CLA signature is required to get a FAS
account is not accurate. It is necessary to sign the CLA to make a
contribution to Fedora, but not simply to get a FAS account.
Thanks Spot for this correction. I signed the CLA back in the days long
before FAS, so I wasn't aware of this.
Hey, I signed the cla when we had to FAX SOMETHING IN, so don't feel bad
about getting confused about when it changed. ;)
-sv
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
