On 05/19/2009 10:08 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Sorry, but I disagree. Remember, we already had ambassadors leaving the > project after the CLA changed. I don't share their concerns (otherwise I > had to resign, too), but I do see there are people not willing to sign > the current CLA which means they cannot get a FAS account. This is a separate issue, lets not dogpile everything together unnecessarily. There are some legitimate issues with the current CLA that I am constantly working on resolving, but this is perhaps the most complicated legal matter currently on Fedora Legal's plate. Even with that, your statement that a CLA signature is required to get a FAS account is not accurate. It is necessary to sign the CLA to make a contribution to Fedora, but not simply to get a FAS account. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
