Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Tom "spot" Callaway: > On 05/19/2009 10:08 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Sorry, but I disagree. Remember, we already had ambassadors leaving the > > project after the CLA changed. I don't share their concerns (otherwise I > > had to resign, too), but I do see there are people not willing to sign > > the current CLA which means they cannot get a FAS account. > > This is a separate issue, lets not dogpile everything together > unnecessarily. There are some legitimate issues with the current CLA > that I am constantly working on resolving, but this is perhaps the most > complicated legal matter currently on Fedora Legal's plate. Even with > that, your statement that a CLA signature is required to get a FAS > account is not accurate. It is necessary to sign the CLA to make a > contribution to Fedora, but not simply to get a FAS account. Thanks Spot for this correction. I signed the CLA back in the days long before FAS, so I wasn't aware of this. > ~spot Regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
