On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I'm curious Ralf, can you name 3 things that a candidate might have that
match your criteria?
In this vote, my criteria has been (in decreasing importance):
* Not being @RH, because I wanted to see the community strengthened in
this already @RH-predominated FPB and therefore don't see much reason
into adding more @RHs.
Funny, this was my primary criteria as well -- yet when I cite this, this
criteria is dismissed as "playing a game". That's a bit frustrating to
me.
* Exclude people of whom I had learned not to be trustworthy.
* People having a measurable record as Fedora contributor.
* The candidates' interests overlapping with my personal interests.
So from these criteria, you could find no candidates that were worth your
vote. Which begs three questions:
1. Is there a potential candidate in the whole world of Fedora
contributors who would have met these criteria?
2. If so, did you encourage them to run?
3. If not, why not?
--g
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
