On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 07:23 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I can see a lot of good points in the discussion. But if it all boils > >> down to "I don't have time to participate in Fedora governance," then just > >> say that. Because that's really what you are saying. > > Partially correct. > > > > Better would be: I don't have time nor interest in actively > > participating in this governance system. I do have the time and interest > > to vote on MY delegate, such that I feel my opinion is represented in > > this "governance system". > > > > I think we are still suffering from communication bit loss somewhere > (German to English or just the human usual I forgot to type > something). Are you wanting regional representational democracy? > organizational representational democracy? Nope. I want "a delegate whose intentions/interests match with mine at least to some extend" and whom I learned to be trustworthy. This is not tied to nationality, continents, sex, race, religion or what ever. It's simply a matter of "finding someone to vote for" amongst candidates during votes. > parliamentary system? > republic system? A constitutional system? Well, yes, I would find something along these lines better than the current system. Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
