On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:20 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 17:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > In this vote, my criteria has been (in decreasing importance): > > * Not being @RH, because I wanted to see the community strengthened in > > this already @RH-predominated FPB and therefore don't see much reason > > into adding more @RHs. > > Do you feel that every Red Hat employee is the same person, and that we > all have the same opinions and ideals? Not at all, except that _some_ @RH's appear to "drink the same kool-aid, talks in uniform, and would all wear matching clothes". > Is our getting a paycheck from > Red Hat somehow make us less interested in seeing Fedora be the greater > good for the greater community? Is there no way to get past this > prejudice ? This is not prejudice, my criterion above had primarily been a political decision, because ... (see above) I want to see the community strengthened and not to be furtherly predominated with further @RHs. To some of the @RH candidates anther thought applied: I consider the concentration of "responibilities" in Fedora some people have accumulated to be unhealthy. IMO, Fedora should find regulations for such situations, e.g. FESCO and FPB positions to be mutually exclusive. Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
