On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Any possible benefit from anonymous contributors is vastly outweighed by > the restrictions we'd have to make in the infrastructure group. > > The CLA is a legal document, providing accountability to Fedora and Red > Hat. We need a real, legal name for that document, and I don't think we > should even attempt to guarantee anonymity for anyone. > > It goes against the spirit of Open Source, which is the spirit of > Fedora. +1 /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
