Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:48:04 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As has been indicated before, the board already has a stake in the
discussion having expressed the desire to see Fedora as a better
upstream and having initiated the SCM SIG. So it is not really a
The Board didn't start the SCM SIG.
I know that. They expressed the desire to see it happen which is exactly
the kind of actions that I am asking for.
Your insistence at having them declare something one way or another
seems to be nothing more than whining because you aren't getting your
way.
I really have no personal stake on it. So this is a gross mis
characterization and only distracts us from having a conversation about
real issues. Please avoid doing so.
It's not a distraction. You're essentially going around the people
that have the most knowledge about the necessities involved by trying
to invoke the Board to tell them how to do their role.
What am I doing is expressing a wish to see this happen and explaining
why I believe it is important that the board take a active role on these
matters as a former member myself. This is neither whining nor
dictating anything. If anybody thinks they have all the knowledge they
ever need to act on these things and aren't open to hearing others
ideas, then I am afraid there is nothing more to discuss.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
