Re: Hosting and Supporting GIT conversion of Fedora CVS to enable downstream development efforts and distributions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:

I don't think anybody disagrees that we should move to another SCM that
allows for better downstream interaction.  However just a direct copy
of our workflow to git doesn't help.

If it doesn't help people wouldn't have requested it in the first place. It might be the case that we don't want that as a final plan but this could be a incremental process. Provide a copy and mark it as experimental. See how well it used and then if the advantages are compelling to more people, some might take the initiative to move us to a distributed SCM altogether.

Nobody wants to work on the hard
problem, thus nothing gets done, no matter /who/ wants it.

Has the Fedora Board recognized that moving to a distributed SCM is desirable for downstream folks and asked Fedora infrastructure to work on that or indicated in any way that this is the future direction? I think this is one of the instances where the Fedora Board should take on a more active role.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux