Re: codec buddy pain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:57 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:43 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > 
> > > 4.  Point to a Fedora controlled URL that has a list of current
> > > providers of legal software to play the content.  Something that is
> > > controlled by Fedora (Board) and clearly not just a commercial for
> > > $COMPANY.
> > 
> > Yes, Jesse.  You're exactly right.  Even if it creates an extra step for 
> > the user.
> > 
> > The problem, IIRC, is that the Fluendo folks did the work and we are 
> > consuming the upstream code without modification.  Is this correct?  Is 
> > this literally a matter of changing URLs in Codeina -- a %config change in 
> > our RPM?  Does anyone know the answer to this?
> 
> mostly a change to an xml file in codeina to purge out the other
> references.
> 
> we also have to have something sensible to repoint it to.

You mean more sensible than www.fedoraproject.org/CodecBuddy ? 
I really don't get it; that page was written by board people, in
response to feedback from the board. What more do you want ?



_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux