On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 10:40 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > * Before: FE had a functional work-flow, functional simple reviews, > > > functional bugzilla, some bureaucracy, non-functional QA. > > > Now: koji, bodhi, flagged-reviews, broken bugzilla, more bureaucracy, > > > still non-functional QA. > > > > I've seen you say this. I think I have seen other contributors agree > > with some of those points. We're addressing them as fast as we can. > > And in support Ralf's point that we need to pursue releasing early and > releasing often, ... when something is "ready" and stable enough. > thanks to rel-eng and QA for DOING EXACTLY THAT. ... if they also apply "Fix early, fix ASAP" ... > We can't wait for the new QA system to be perfect before we start using > it, can we? That is the Cathedral model. Right, but ... prematurely deploying something and ignoring bugs/deficiencies etc. also doesn't help anybody. Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
