On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > * Before: FE had a functional work-flow, functional simple reviews, > > functional bugzilla, some bureaucracy, non-functional QA. > > Now: koji, bodhi, flagged-reviews, broken bugzilla, more bureaucracy, > > still non-functional QA. > > I've seen you say this. I think I have seen other contributors agree > with some of those points. We're addressing them as fast as we can. And in support Ralf's point that we need to pursue releasing early and releasing often, thanks to rel-eng and QA for DOING EXACTLY THAT. We can't wait for the new QA system to be perfect before we start using it, can we? That is the Cathedral model. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
