Re: governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:29 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote:

"Gradual transition" is what has been missing. Too many changes at once and shortly before a final release of the distribution. Effectively, you've slammed a door into the faces of lots of Extras contributors. A new build system, undocumented changes in the procedures (e.g. buildroot "poisoning") and a dramatically changed work-flow.
I have heard that complaint. It is my understanding that there are active steps being taken to make this better (I wrote as much on LWN yesterday), especially at the FESCO level, which is one of the things that we want FESCO to be able to lead!

Am I wrong?
Do yourself a favor an submit a package for review and try to maintain
it afterwards.

You'll then probably very soon experience what this all is about. I'd
also propose Karsten to look over your shoulders during this.

Put up or shut up Ralf.  You think you're helping but your not.

https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/bodhi

Do yourself a favor and submit a patch for review and try to aid with changes afterwards
.
You'll then probably very soon experience what this is all about. I'd also propose you
document your experience on the wiki for others to learn from.

   -Mike

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux