On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:40:22AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > [about RH controlled board being above fesco] > Exactly this is the point I want to see changed in near future, and feel > to be inevitable to be changed mid-term if Fedora wants to be a success. Do you feel like Fedora is not a success due to that model? I think both that Fedora is a success and what is not working properly is not due to RH imposing any pressure. > ATM, I am seeing to many "dark room" decisions taking effect, which are > not in the community's interest. Very true, but I don't think there is a difference between community and RH here. My personal dark chamber blues are led by a community member. > > If you like, you could consider that some part of the fesco > > non-technical powers it once had have been elevated to the board, > > and vice versa the board dropped micro-managing into engineering > > related questions. Since you get to vote part of the board the > > community has not lost any powers. > > Well, I'd agree if this FESCo was to replace current FAB or if FAB was > "just consulting FESCo". (BTW I think FAB != board, FAB are the couple dozens of people on this list, while the board are 9 people) > However, as I perceive it, Fedora actually is controlled by FAB, who > leaves some "administrational peanuts" to FESCo - Pretty poor, IMO. You need a singular controlling instance in every scheme, be that a Linux distribution, a company, a goverment, or even a gang. > Hmm, my vision of a Fedora government is Fedora to be governed by a > "parliament" populated with both RH and community > delegates/representatives. How to label such a parliament (be it FAB or > FESCo) is secondary. But that's how the board will work, 4 people get elected (community) and 5 appointed from RH. You get the mix you mention. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp8hm9iRHAW2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board