Re: governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:29 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > "Gradual transition" is what has been missing. Too many changes at 
> > once and shortly before a final release of the distribution. 
> > Effectively, you've slammed a door into the faces of lots of Extras 
> > contributors. A new build system, undocumented changes in the 
> > procedures (e.g. buildroot "poisoning") and a dramatically changed 
> > work-flow.
> 
> I have heard that complaint.  It is my understanding that there are 
> active steps being taken to make this better (I wrote as much on LWN 
> yesterday), especially at the FESCO level, which is one of the things 
> that we want FESCO to be able to lead!
> 
> Am I wrong?
Do yourself a favor an submit a package for review and try to maintain
it afterwards.

You'll then probably very soon experience what this all is about. I'd
also propose Karsten to look over your shoulders during this.

Ralf


_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux