On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:30:16AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 11 June 2007 23:43:00 John Poelstra wrote: > > I'm guessing changing the name of the "development" repo to "rawhide" > > could cause more confusion at the mirrors and in /etc/yum.repos.d/. ?How > > big of problem is this and are there any big reasons not to change > > "development" to "rawhide"? ?Worth targeting for F8? > > I'm fine with changing our public marketing of this repo to be 'rawhide' Or > codenamed 'rawhide'. The directory can stay development/ as the users rarely > have to worry about what the directory is, so long as the mirror list returns > correctly or the commented out baseurl functions. The mirrorlist already uses the name 'rawhide', and I've updated the publiclist mirror pages to say 'rawhide'. So, it's just a matter of changing the fedora-development.repo file to say [rawhide] instead of [development]. [development] name=Fedora - Development #baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/os/ mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 We'll have another reason to change the fedora-release package soonish, to enable failovermethod=priority on the mirrorlist results, as soon as a couple changes land in python-GeoIP and mirrormanager. It would make sense to roll this rename into that update so as to not churn too many times. -Matt _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board