rawhide and Fedora QA [was Re: why I'm using Ubuntu instead of Fedora ATM]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Returning to an old rant, where I described some of the reasons I was
still using Ubuntu:[1]

On 1/3/07, Luis Villa <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* QA: Ubuntu aggressively pushes people to use their development
branch and report problems, which leads to better, more stable final
releases. At the time I chose to use Ubuntu, people were not just not
encouraged, but actively discouraged from using rawhide. This is
improving...

When I went looking for rawhide information tonight, I found it
impossible to find, so maybe I take back what I said about the
situation improving :/ Try googling for 'fedora rawhide', or 'rawhide
site:fedoraproject.org' and see what you get.

What is up with that? I ask here because it could be a web or
marketing team problem (page exists, but needs SEO love) or because it
could be a QA team problem (page forgotten about?[2] page not deemed
to be required?)

Whatever the cause/responsibility for the problem, it seems like a
critical problem to fix.[3]

Luis

[1] I'm now running F7.
[2] free tip: on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA rawhide should be
more prominent than, say, CLAs. CLAs don't help find bugs. Also, it
would help if rawhide were mentioned *at all*. :)
[3] Am willing to lecture on the criticality of the problem at great
length if necessary, but I assume it should be self-evident for most
here.

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux