On 12.06.2007 18:55, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:32 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 12.06.2007 18:10, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>>> * bodhi, koji are immature, semi-functional, semi-cooked pieces of SW >>>> which still have to prove their longevity, but so far don't do anything >>>> but introducing bureaucracy and are almost strangling former FE. >>> But "good enough" to get the job done *now*. >>> Could you provide constructive suggestions(1) on how to make things better? >> Better documentation. A step by step guide: "how to update a Fedora >> package for dummies after the merge" or "The way of a package update: >> from cvs commit over koji and bodi into the proper repo". Linked on >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers please. > > Yes, this needs to happen. I've put it on the schedule for this week's > FESCo meeting to discuss and hopefully find a volunteer other than > myself to do the writing, but if no one else does, I'll do it. Because > you're right, this is sorely needed and we're past the crunch which kept > us from doing it from the get-go Thanks Jeremy. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
