On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 23:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Thursday 07 June 2007 12:52:00 Mike McGrath wrote: > >> I'd like to point out that we can re-org the mailing lists without > >> hosting it ourselves. I just want to make sure the infrastructure team > >> doesn't take on this, which is a pretty major task, just because 2 or 3 > >> people want it that way. Is there general support from the FAB to host > >> this ourselves? > > > > I'm far more in favor of letting Red Hat to continue hosting the mailman > > stuff. If we can do it with a different domain, great. > > I think this is the desirable path, atleast for now. > > 1) If there is consensus on this, what are the steps involved? How long > would it take to get done? f-infra-l question > 2) Who is taking the responsibility of talking to Red Hat IT and getting > direct access to setup fedora mailing lists or getting and enforcing a > SLA from the team? f-infra-l question > 3) Do we want to move the domain and then do a reorganization or both > together? I recommend both, and I think this is a usability question more than a community-preference question. That moves it from the realm of f-a-b into ... golly, I dunno. f-websites-l seems to be the group best staffed to discuss usability issues ... - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
