On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:16:35PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > >On Thursday 07 June 2007 12:52:00 Mike McGrath wrote: > >>I'd like to point out that we can re-org the mailing lists without > >>hosting it ourselves. I just want to make sure the infrastructure team > >>doesn't take on this, which is a pretty major task, just because 2 or 3 > >>people want it that way. Is there general support from the FAB to host > >>this ourselves? > > > >I'm far more in favor of letting Red Hat to continue hosting the mailman > >stuff. If we can do it with a different domain, great. > > I think this is the desirable path, atleast for now. > > 1) If there is consensus on this, what are the steps involved? How long > would it take to get done? > > 2) Who is taking the responsibility of talking to Red Hat IT and getting > direct access to setup fedora mailing lists or getting and enforcing a > SLA from the team? > > 3) Do we want to move the domain and then do a reorganization or both > together? Technically it doesn't matter as if the same mailman instance is used, all you can do is hide the lists from the web view of the various mailman virtual domains. But you need to keep the global constraint of disjoint mailing list names, so dropping fedora- prefix will probably not work. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpmxVDzJ8XHc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
