On Friday 08 June 2007 13:57:18 Axel Thimm wrote: > Doesn't that short-cirquit fesco out of the loop? E.g. if fesco is > supposed to be overseeing those two teams it sounds like > > a) board decides on Halloween/May Day ETA > b) fesco interacts with feature/releng teams and lays out a plan to > fulfill the board's input. > c) fesco presents to the board the results, e.g. whether this is > possible and what the constraining parameters will be (which > features will make it etc) > > If this is considered too much hierarchical procedure then these two > teams need to be attached to the board directly. I overlooked this myself. IMHO the release team and feature team and QA team should present their thoughts/desires to FESCo to decide on the schedule and -that- would be presented to the board for final sign off. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpOsMLmbfiOY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
