On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 14:17 -0400, Max Spevack wrote: > Fair enough. I would like FESCO to be as lightweight as possible, while > still providing necessary and proper oversight. > > That's sort of my leadership/management theory in general, actually. You cannot easily lighten another's load without their wanting it, though. *All* steering committees are empowered to pass on "responsibility of decision making" to a smaller group. If FESCo is feeling too heavy with discussions and decisions, it can easily choose to empower a few members, a SIG, etc. to make a decision. FESCo retains the "accountability of the decision", and takes that to FPB, who are the group accountable to (in order) the Community, the Contributors, and the Sponsors. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
