On May 18, 2007, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2007 16:45:48 Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Is it correct to assume that the legal implications of this move have >> been run through legal > Given that Max has said "A full copy of the proposed EULA is attached, and in > its current form it has been approved by Legal." I would say yes. No so fast! Per what Max had written, legal had approved the EULA. What he wrote then didn't apply to the Firstboot text. So I asked. > The legal team for the company you work for has approved this. Now we know this is true, so I'm no longer concerned, and I'll go study copyrights on collections, since my lack of knowledge on this topic is showing ;-) Cheers, -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
