On Fri, 18 May 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 18, 2007, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 16:45:48 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Is it correct to assume that the legal implications of this move have
been run through legal
Given that Max has said "A full copy of the proposed EULA is attached, and in
its current form it has been approved by Legal." I would say yes.
No so fast! Per what Max had written, legal had approved the EULA.
What he wrote then didn't apply to the Firstboot text. So I asked.
The legal team for the company you work for has approved this.
Now we know this is true, so I'm no longer concerned, and I'll go
study copyrights on collections, since my lack of knowledge on this
topic is showing ;-)
Easy, everyone. :-)
I've sent Mark a note with some of the comments in this thread, and if
he wants to recommend any changes to firstboot or EULA text, he will.
--Max
--
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
