On Wednesday 11 April 2007 10:49:11 Max Spevack wrote: > Maybe that was just me being behind on email -- but I don't think it's out > of line to sit down 6 weeks before the release and say "ok, we've got all > the leaders of various sub-groups more or less in the same place. Let's > go down the list and try to touch on everything." > > If I go around and personally ask the KDE spin guys about that, and > Jesse/Jeremy/Mike about the build system, and do the Summit DVD stuff > myself, then things get done, but information doesn't really flow. Or I > could go to the IRC meeting for each of those groups and spend my whole > week in chat rooms. Neither option seems particulalry good. > > My goal with yesterday's meeting was to get the general status of all > things F7 out there for everyone to be at a pretty similar baseline, and > allow people to talk out their issues in one place. > > Basically it was a big Engineering Status Meeting, that we used the Board > meeting time for. That works for me. Take away the connotations of it being a Board Meeting and it seemed fine. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpchmalCWL2v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
