On Wednesday 11 April 2007 08:29:10 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'd say most of those things are > engineering tasks that would have been dealed by the Core Cabal in the > past. So these things maybe should be discussed in "pre meeting > meetings" (e.g. Live-CD meeting, release team meeting) and then reported > to the Core Cabal successor, which is FESCO, and not the Board. > > Of course the Board is free to get involved in those Live-CD/release > team/FESCo meeting if it's a big picture task where the Board is > interested in helping getting it done; or even bring it up in a Board > meeting itself if needed. Sure, whatever. Seems a bit silly to repeat the same report to multiple places, but... maybe we can find better ways of getting this information spread around. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpccLHIxQ81L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
