On 11.04.2007 13:56, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 10 April 2007 23:13:34 Bill Nottingham wrote: >> So... is it just me, or does it seem horribly wrong that this is being >> done at the *board* meeting? Shouldn't we be having release meetings >> for this sort of thing? >> It seems to me that much of the benefit of this meeting was merely >> getting various people (f13 + mmcgrath for build, katzj + the revisor >> people) in the same place to work through some issues. Maybe that's >> a function of this weeks agenda more than the meeting format. > Not just you. My feeling is that these things should have been met and > decided over, +1 > then reported by the right person during the Fedora Board > meeting. Now, I'm not usually a fan of pre meeting meetings, but in this > case.... Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'd say most of those things are engineering tasks that would have been dealed by the Core Cabal in the past. So these things maybe should be discussed in "pre meeting meetings" (e.g. Live-CD meeting, release team meeting) and then reported to the Core Cabal successor, which is FESCO, and not the Board. Of course the Board is free to get involved in those Live-CD/release team/FESCo meeting if it's a big picture task where the Board is interested in helping getting it done; or even bring it up in a Board meeting itself if needed. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
