On Wednesday 03 January 2007 12:19, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Actually I'd like to see this, too, but Fedora people seem to be so > unwilling to support something like that so I tried the "better ask for > something that's not that hard to realize and lies between the current > solution and the best/ideal solution; maybe then the chances to get what > we ask for are higher and it make one big part of the problem go away, > even if parts of the problem remain"-approach Well, we could do this, but it would involve an explosion of epochs :/ Our ability to roll back package versions that were 'mistakes' is very very useful. The only way to keep this is to use epochs to "force" a lower version package to win. Once epoch, always epoch. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpEUGaW6yMZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
